England Cases

There are over 300 English cases in our database. This page shows all the cases by default, but you can filter the list by using the search tool above. You can search within the title, key terms, court name, judge's name and case notes fields by inputting a word, or words, or part of a word, or a phrase, into the search box.

  • 30th March 2007
    Hart Investments Ltd v T.M.C. Fidler (t/a Terence Fidler Partnership) [2007] EWHC 1058 (TCC)
  • 26th March 2007
    Rohde v Markham-David (No 2) [2007] EWHC 1408 (TCC)
    This summary was provided by CMS Cameron McKenna LLP. For more information visit http://www.cms-cmck.com/Construction/Construction-Disputes It is incumbent on the adjudicator to ensure that the relevant documentation has been validly served and brought to the attention of the responding party.  Failure to do so may lead to an unenforceable adjudication decision on the grounds that the adjudication is deemed not to have been validly started and/or conducted with minimum standards of fairness and natural justice.His Honour Judge Thornton QC – Queen’s Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court This judgment relates to the trial of a claim that was previously the subject of an application for summary judgment.  Please click here to read our Adjudication Zone case summary of that summary judgment (which sets out the facts to the case).The principal issue was...
  • 20th March 2007
    Claymore Services Ltd v Nautilus Properties Ltd [2007] EWHC 805 (TCC)
  • 15th March 2007
    R C Pillar & Son v The Camber [2007] EWHC 1626 (TCC)
    This summary was provided by CMS Cameron McKenna LLP. For more information visit http://www.cms-cmck.com/Construction/Construction-Disputes Where a responding party participates in an adjudication having reserved its right to challenge the appointment of the adjudicator on jurisdictional grounds, it may lose that right if it advances counter-claims of its own in the adjudication.His Honour Judge Thornton QC – Queen’s Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court Pillar, a building contractor, sought to enforce an adjudicator’s decision in its favour against Camber, the party for whom the work from which the dispute arose was carried out.  From the outset of the adjudication, Camber had challenged the jurisdiction of the adjudicator, stating in its response document that it would only take part in the adjudication on the basis that such action would not prejudice...
  • 14th March 2007
    Flannery Construction Ltd v M Holleran (2007) Ltd [2007] EWHC 825 (TCC)
  • 12th March 2007
    Multiplex Constructions (UK) Ltd v Cleveland Bridge UK Ltd No 3 [2007] EWHC 659 (TCC)
  • 6th March 2007
    Multiplex Constructions (UK) Ltd v Honeywell Control Systems Ltd (No2) [2007] EWHC 447 (TCC)
  • 27th February 2007
    Honeywell Control Systems Ltd. v Multiplex Constructions (UK) Ltd. [2007] EWHC 390 (TCC)
  • 9th February 2007
    Middleton (G) Ltd v Berry Creek Overseas Development Ltd [2007] EWHC 318 (TCC)
  • 9th February 2007
    Hart Investments Ltd v Larchpark Ltd. [2007] EWHC 291 (TCC)