- Home
- Nomination
- UK Cases
- Overseas Cases
- Panel
- Guidance
- Glossary
- Legislation
- England & Wales
- Wales
- Scotland
- Northern Ireland
- Australia (Australian Capital Territory)
- Australia (New South Wales)
- Australia (Northern Territory)
- Australia (Queensland)
- Australia (Southern Territory)
- Australia (Tasmania)
- Australia (Victoria)
- Australia (Western Australia)
- Eire
- Isle of Man
- Malaysia
- New Zealand
- Singapore
- Links
- Contact Us
Uszok v Henley Properties (NSW) Pty Limited [2007] NSWCA 31
CONTRACT – building contract – implication of term by custom or usage - whether custom or usage so well-known to home owners to imply term into contract – whether implication contrary to express terms of contract - REASONS FOR DECISION – whether trial judge gave adequate reasons for decision – whether trial judge failed to properly engage in fact-finding exercise – determination of expert evidence - DAMAGES – damages for breach of building contract – whether damage proved – rejection of evidence - difficulties in estimating loss – damages should not be nominal - UNREPRESENTED LITIGANT – duty of a trial judge - whether trial judge ensured unrepresented party understood procedural options – failure to provide explanation of processes - APPEAL – order for new trial - whether trial sufficiently unfair to demonstrate miscarriage
LEGISLATION CITED: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 56 (1),(2) - Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) s 75A - Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW) Pt 51 r 23
Click here to read full-screen | Click here to print the case