- Home
- Nomination
- UK Cases
- Overseas Cases
- Panel
- Guidance
- Glossary
- Legislation
- England & Wales
- Wales
- Scotland
- Northern Ireland
- Australia (Australian Capital Territory)
- Australia (New South Wales)
- Australia (Northern Territory)
- Australia (Queensland)
- Australia (Southern Territory)
- Australia (Tasmania)
- Australia (Victoria)
- Australia (Western Australia)
- Eire
- Isle of Man
- Malaysia
- New Zealand
- Singapore
- Links
- Contact Us
Ettamogah Pub (Rouse Hill) P/L v Consolidated Constructions P/L (in liq) [2006] NSWSC 1450
CORPORATIONS – Winding-up – Winding-up in insolvency – Statutory demand – Application to set aside statutory demand – Genuine dispute as to indebtedness – Offsetting and other like claims – Plaintiff and defendant, a builder, entered into building contract – Defendant lodged payment claims with plaintiff pursuant to s 13 Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) – Plaintiff liable to pay defendant pursuant to s 14(4) Security of Payment Act – Defendant commenced proceedings and obtained judgment in its favour – Defendant served plaintiff with statutory demand in same amount as judgment debt – Whether seriously arguable that plaintiff entitled to relief pursuant to s 32 Security of Payment Act – Whether seriously arguable that plaintiff entitled to damages against defendant for defendant’s failure to complete building works on time – Whether seriously arguable that plaintiff entitled to damages against defendant for cost of rectifying defects in building works – s 459H Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) considered – Whether failure of plaintiff to lodge proofs of debt against defendant, now in liquidation, precludes plaintiff from raising alleged offsetting claims – Application granted.
ACTS CITED: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW)
Click here to read full-screen | Click here to print the case