- Home
- Nomination
- UK Cases
- Overseas Cases
- Panel
- Guidance
- Glossary
- Legislation
- England & Wales
- Wales
- Scotland
- Northern Ireland
- Australia (Australian Capital Territory)
- Australia (New South Wales)
- Australia (Northern Territory)
- Australia (Queensland)
- Australia (Southern Territory)
- Australia (Tasmania)
- Australia (Victoria)
- Australia (Western Australia)
- Eire
- Isle of Man
- Malaysia
- New Zealand
- Singapore
- Links
- Contact Us
Brady Constructions Pty Ltd v Everest Projects Developments [2009] VSC 622
Civil – Appeal from Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal decision – Application for injunction restraining respondent from presenting a bank guarantee refused - Tribunal found a serious issue to be tried – Tribunal not satisfied that the balance of convenience favoured grant of injunction - Serious risk the respondent would not be able to repay the bank guarantee or any part thereof if required to do so in future – The Tribunal failed to have regard to critical material considerations affecting the real prospect of a risk of injustice – Matter remitted for further hearing by a differently constituted division of the Tribunal - Bradto Pty Ltd v State of Victoria [2006] VSCA 89; (2006) 15 VR 65 - Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8; (1959) 101 CLR 298 - Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2002 - Appeals Costs Act 1998 s 4.
Click here to read full-screen | Click here to print the case