- Home
- Nomination
- UK Cases
- Overseas Cases
- Panel
- Guidance
- Glossary
- Legislation
- England & Wales
- Wales
- Scotland
- Northern Ireland
- Australia (Australian Capital Territory)
- Australia (New South Wales)
- Australia (Northern Territory)
- Australia (Queensland)
- Australia (Southern Territory)
- Australia (Tasmania)
- Australia (Victoria)
- Australia (Western Australia)
- Eire
- Isle of Man
- Malaysia
- New Zealand
- Singapore
- Links
- Contact Us
Republic of Turkey v Mackie Pty Ltd & Anor [2012] VSC 309
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2002 (Vic) – Adjudication conducted under Part 3 Division 2 of the Act – Whether Adjudicator had jurisdiction – Decision open to review by way of certiorari – Whether finding by adjudicator that payment claim valid reviewable – Removal of conditions not permitted under the Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995 (Vic) – Whether construction of a Consular Residence is a ‘Domestic Building Contract’ – Application of s 7(2)(b) of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payments Act 2002 (Vic) - Director of Housing of the State of Victoria v Structx Pty Ltd [2011] VSC 410 applied.
STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – Definition of ‘Domestic Building Contract’ as defined in section 3 of the Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995 (Vic) – Definition as defined in section 5 of the Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995 (Vic) - Is a ‘Domestic Building Contract’ as defined in the Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995 (Vic) such that by section 7 of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payments Act 2002 (Vic) the Contract was excluded from that Act – Relevance of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, (entered into force on 24 April 1964) Article 30(1) to construction of the Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995 (Vic) considered in the circumstances.
Click here to read full-screen | Click here to print the case