- Home
- Nomination
- UK Cases
- Overseas Cases
- Panel
- Guidance
- Glossary
- Legislation
- England & Wales
- Wales
- Scotland
- Northern Ireland
- Australia (Australian Capital Territory)
- Australia (New South Wales)
- Australia (Northern Territory)
- Australia (Queensland)
- Australia (Southern Territory)
- Australia (Tasmania)
- Australia (Victoria)
- Australia (Western Australia)
- Eire
- Isle of Man
- Malaysia
- New Zealand
- Singapore
- Links
- Contact Us
Hansen Yuncken Pty Ltd v Ian James Ericson trading as Flea’s Concreting [2010] QSC 156
Administrative Law– Judicial Review –Eviewable Decisions snd Conduct – Generally – where an adjudicator upheld the first respondent’s claim for a progress payment under the Building & Construction Industry Payments Act 2004 (Qld) – where the applicant challenges that decision on the basis that it was procured by the fraud of the first respondent – whether an adjudicator’s decision procured by fraud may be the subject of judicial review. - Building and Construction Industry Payments Act 2004 (Qld) ss 18, 24(4), 33 - Judicial Review Act 1991 (Qld) Sch 1 Pt 2, ss 18(2), 41 - Justice and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2007 (Qld)ss 90-91 - Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW)...........
Click here to read full-screen | Click here to print the case