- Home
- Nomination
- UK Cases
- Overseas Cases
- Panel
- Guidance
- Glossary
- Legislation
- England & Wales
- Wales
- Scotland
- Northern Ireland
- Australia (Australian Capital Territory)
- Australia (New South Wales)
- Australia (Northern Territory)
- Australia (Queensland)
- Australia (Southern Territory)
- Australia (Tasmania)
- Australia (Victoria)
- Australia (Western Australia)
- Eire
- Isle of Man
- Malaysia
- New Zealand
- Singapore
- Links
- Contact Us
Barclay Mowlem Construction v Tesrol Walsh Bay [2004] NSWSC 716
BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION - Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) - where plaintiff moves for summary judgment - whether defendant has arguable defence to preclude plaintiff from obtaining summary judgment - where document alleged to be payment schedule did not indicate the payment defendant intended to make - whether defendant provided payment schedule for purposes of s 14 - requirements of payment schedules - whether question to be determined on final hearing and not by way of summary judgment - estoppel by representation - where alleged representation that parties take no further step in response to claim until negotiations take place - whether defendant relied upon representation to its detriment by taking no further steps under Act in respect of payment claim - whether estoppel defence prohibited by s 34 - whether question to be resolved on application for summary judgment
ACTS CITED: Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) - Trades Practices Act 1974
Click here to read full-screen | Click here to print the case