- Home
- Nomination
- UK Cases
- Overseas Cases
- Panel
- Guidance
- Glossary
- Legislation
- England & Wales
- Wales
- Scotland
- Northern Ireland
- Australia (Australian Capital Territory)
- Australia (New South Wales)
- Australia (Northern Territory)
- Australia (Queensland)
- Australia (Southern Territory)
- Australia (Tasmania)
- Australia (Victoria)
- Australia (Western Australia)
- Eire
- Isle of Man
- Malaysia
- New Zealand
- Singapore
- Links
- Contact Us
Gantley Pty Ltd v Phoenix International Group [2010] VSC 106
Building Contracts - Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2002 (Vic) – Progress claim under s.14 of the Act as it was prior to the operation of Act No. 42 of 2006 – Requirement to identify work in progress claim under s.14 of the Act – Degree of specificity in identification of work required - Consequences of non-compliance with identification requirement – Severance of part of payment claim open – Considerations in applying severance – Consequences of invalidity of payment claim – Test for jurisdictional error in adjudicator’s determination – Whether service of progress claim under the Act after termination of construction contract permitted – Circumstances in which progress claim may be served after construction contract terminated – Whether final payment claims permitted to be made under pre-amended Act – Whether final payment claims permitted to be made under amended Act – What constitutes “progress claim” – What constitutes “final payment claim” – Whether invalidity under s.14 of the Act by reason of more than one payment claim made.
Click here to read full-screen | Click here to print the case